Nobody moves abroad to save three points of tax and lose thirty percent of purchasing power. The two figures have to be read together, and almost nobody publishes them side by side.

Here are the destinations people actually consider, sorted by what they cost, with what a newcomer pays in tax next to them. Three received ideas do not survive the table.

Dubai costs almost as much as the United States

The Emirates sit at 69 % of the US level. You pay no income tax, and your monthly budget looks a lot like the one you left. The gap is almost entirely housing, which absorbs the tax saving for a good share of arrivals.

That does not disqualify the destination, whose FiScore of 8.9 remains among the best in the world. It means you have to run the numbers with a real rent, not with the assumption that a country without income tax is a cheap country.

The European low-tax havens are not cheap

This is the second reflex that costs money. Malta sits at 69 % of the US level, Cyprus at 67 %, Andorra at 76 %, Singapore at 78 %. Their tax treatment is excellent, Malta scoring 8.4 and Cyprus 7.5, but you do not live there for less than you did at home.

The practical consequence: these countries work for high incomes, where the tax saving comfortably clears the cost of living. On an average budget the arithmetic does not close.

Portugal lost both advantages at once

It is still the most quoted destination in every guide. It now sits at 65 % of the US level, and its FiScore has fallen to 3.7 since the non-habitual resident regime closed. Expensive, and taxed. It is the country where the gap between reputation and figures is widest, and we covered what replaced the regime in our Portugal guide.

The table

Destination Cost of living FiScore Tax base Moving in
Bulgaria 24 % 7.2 worldwide, 10 % EU free movement
Vietnam 30 % (2024) 5.4 worldwide visa
Indonesia (Bali) 31 % 5.1 worldwide visa
Thailand 32 % 5.6 remittance visa
Malaysia 33 % 7.4 remittance visa
Philippines 36 % 7.2 territorial visa
Paraguay 38 % 8.5 territorial visa
Georgia 40 % 7.6 territorial visa
Colombia 41 % 3.3 worldwide visa
Morocco 42 % 4.6 worldwide visa
Mauritius 44 % 6.5 remittance visa
Romania 49 % 6.7 worldwide, 10 % EU free movement
Montenegro 49 % 6.9 worldwide visa
Panama 50 % 7.5 territorial visa
Hungary 58 % 6.5 worldwide EU free movement
Mexico 59 % 4.2 worldwide visa
Costa Rica 62 % 6.7 territorial visa
Portugal 65 % 3.7 worldwide EU free movement
Greece 66 % 3.7 worldwide EU free movement
Cyprus 67 % 7.5 worldwide EU free movement
United Arab Emirates 69 % 8.9 worldwide, nil rate visa
Spain 69 % 3.5 worldwide EU free movement
Malta 69 % 8.4 remittance EU free movement
Uruguay 72 % 6.5 worldwide visa
Andorra 76 % (2021) 8.2 worldwide visa
Estonia 76 % 5.2 worldwide EU free movement
Singapore 78 % 8 territorial visa
Switzerland 128 % 4.4 worldwide EU free movement

Where both figures are good at once

Bulgaria is the only line in the table that stacks all three advantages: the lowest cost of living on the list, a flat 10 % on income and on companies, and free movement for any EU citizen. It is also the least glamorous destination here, which is probably why it is so rarely mentioned. For a non-EU reader the visa is a normal one, and the two other figures still hold.

Georgia does better on tax, with territorial taxation that leaves foreign income out of the base entirely, at 40 % of the US level. Its residence route is among the simplest on the list.

Malaysia at 33 % taxes on remittance: what stays out is untaxed. Excellent for someone living off savings already built elsewhere, weaker for someone repatriating a monthly income.

Paraguay and Panama are the two Latin American territorial regimes that hold up, at 38 and 50 %. Paraguay asks for little presence; Panama offers a more developed setting and costs more.

Montenegro and Romania are the two European options behind Bulgaria, at 49 % each, with Romania adding EU free movement.

The cheap destinations that tax you anyway

These are the ones the relocation videos push hardest, and where the shortcut from cheap to advantageous breaks.

  • Thailand at 32 % taxes on remittance, but a FiScore of 5.6 reflects VAT and a schedule that climbs quickly once you bring money in.
  • Bali, meaning Indonesia, at 31 % for a FiScore of 5.1: taxation there is worldwide, and the nomad visa does not change that base.
  • Vietnam at 30 % and a FiScore of 5.4, worldwide as well.
  • Colombia at 41 % for 3.3, and Morocco at 42 % for 4.6.

The low price is real. It does not come with a tax advantage, and you live in a country that taxes your worldwide income much as your own did, simply on a different schedule.

Who this does not work for

  • Anyone still tax resident at home. None of this applies while your former country still treats you as resident. That step comes first: see leaving tax residency properly.
  • Anyone employed by a local company. These figures describe tax on foreign-source income. A locally paid salary follows the local schedule.
  • Anyone on an average budget aiming at Malta, Cyprus or Andorra. Below a certain income the tax saving does not cover the cost of living; that is the direct reading of the table.
  • Americans. US citizens are taxed on worldwide income wherever they live. The table changes what you pay locally, not what the IRS expects, and the guide to leaving the US covers what actually helps.
  • Anyone needing a firm number. Price levels are 2025 except Andorra (2021) and Vietnam (2024). A budget gets rebuilt on the ground, with real rents.

Sources

World Bank for the price level, computed as the purchasing power parity conversion factor over the market exchange rate, most recent series per country, with the year quoted whenever it is not 2025. Rates, tax bases and residence conditions come from our own country pages, each carrying its official source and verification date. Cross-checked against PwC Tax Summaries. Verified in August 2026.

This page informs, it does not advise. On this subject the thing that decides a case is the real rent in the district you are targeting, which no global index and no site can know: use these percentages to shortlist, never to set a budget, as our terms of use say.